TRUMP LAWYERS, BEWARE!

[This post first appeared at BillMoyers.com on Sept. 28, 2017.]

NOTE: On October 3, 2017 at 10:00 EDT/9:00 CDT, my interview with Dan Rather on the Trump-Russia Timeline will air on “Dan Rather’s America” — Radio Andy, Sirius XM 102

Former White House counsel John Dean counted 21 lawyers involved in Watergate wrongdoing. Among the most prominent were President Richard M. Nixon, White House Domestic Affairs Adviser John Ehrlichman, Attorney General John Mitchell, Nixon’s personal attorney Herbert Kalmbach, White House special counsel Charles Colson, Egil “Bud” Krogh—who headed the “Plumbers” unit involved in the break-in—and Dean himself. History may not repeat itself, but sometimes it rhymes.

Obstructing justice requires more than a president’s single-handed efforts. It’s a team sport. Whether intentional or unwitting, complicit attorneys bring a unique disgrace to their profession and do enormous damage to the country. Upon admission to the bar, all of Trump’s advisers with JDs swore an oath to defend the Constitution and uphold the rule of law. Beginning the week of Oct. 1, many of them could face tough questions about whether they witnessed or participated in criminal wrongdoing at the highest levels of government.

At the moment, special counsel Robert Mueller has Trump’s former campaign chairman Paul Manafort (JD, Georgetown, ’74) in the hottest seat. But Mueller has also informed the White House that he wants to interview at least three lawyers who are present or former staffers. Others inside and outside the White House could join that line.

If he is following a typical prosecutorial approach—working from the bottom up in questioning witnesses who may have information pertinent to the investigation—Mueller has already reached rarified air. One of his early picks now sits in the office that John Dean once occupied, White House counsel Don McGahn (JD, Widener, ‘94), who reportedly has “a couple documents” so sensitive that he keeps them locked in a safe and away from Trump’s personal attorney, Ty Cobb (JD, Georgetown, ’78). Thanks to Cobb’s recent public comments over lunch with another Trump attorney, John Dowd (JD, Emory, ’65), Mueller can now be quite specific in seeking that material.

Long before the Cobb-Dowd luncheon that will become a case study in law school courses on professional irresponsibility, Mueller said he wanted to speak with one of McGahn’s deputies, James Burnham, (JD, U of Chicago, ’09). Burnham was reportedly with McGahn on Jan. 26, 2017, when acting Attorney General Sally Yates told them about her concerns with then-national security adviser Michael Flynn. Yet for more than two weeks after that briefing, Flynn remained in the nation’s most sensitive national security post. Reasonable investigators might want to know what McGahn did during to protect the country during that period. After all, the White House counsel is not any president’s personal attorney.

The third lawyer reportedly on Mueller’s current request list is Reince Priebus (JD, Miami, ’98). Other than as an indefatigable Trump defender, Priebus’ role in the Flynn episode is unclear. But Priebus was at the center of another Trump firestorm: the cover-up relating to the firing of FBI Director James Comey.

Apparently, Mueller has not yet questioned other attorneys involved in the Comey cover-up, but everyone knows who they are. Jared Kushner (JD/MBA, NYU, ’07) spent the weekend at Bedminster, NJ urging Trump to fire Comey. Then he reportedly joined Priebus, McGahn, and Vice President Mike Pence (JD-Indiana-Robert W. McKinney, ’86) to draft talking points. Pence saw or heard Trump read aloud his four-page letter outlining the reasons he was firing Comey. Pence also took the cover-up to Capitol Hill.

A president’s outside attorneys are at risk, too. On July 12, 2017, one of Trump’s personal lawyers, Jay Sekulow (JD, Mercer, ’80), told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that Trump had no role in drafting Don Jr.’s first misleading statement about the June 9, 2016 meeting between top Trump advisers and three Russians. “The president didn’t sign off on anything,” he said. Four days later, he told NBC’s Chuck Todd the same thing: “I do want to be clear – that the president was not involved in the drafting of the statement and did not issue the statement.” Sekulow’s best defense now is that he didn’t know what he was talking about.

Since Nixon’s impeachment, the seminal lesson of political scandals has been: “It’s not the crime; it’s the cover-up.” Eventually, the public will learn whether Trump’s advisers have heeded that lesson. When that day arrives, it could become an especially embarrassing moment for those with legal degrees.

 

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH SEPT. 28, 2017

If you think it’s been a quiet week for the Trump-Russia story at BillMoyers.com, think again….

Additions to our main Trump-Russia Timeline:

  • 1980: Stone and Manafort Start a Business [revision of previous entry]
  • 1988: Stone Urges Trump to Run for President
  • 2012: Trump Again Considers Presidential Bid
  • June 2015 to May 2017: Kremlin-linked Russian Company Buys Ads on Facebook; Russian Actors Also Used Twitter [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 22, 2017: Russians Continue Using Twitter to Support Trump
  • Sept. 22, 2017: Former DNI Clapper Expresses Doubt About Legitimacy of Trump’s Election
  • Sept. 25, 2017: Stone Decries Congressional Hearings
  • Sept. 26, 2017: Mueller Interviews of White House Staffers to Begin
  • Sept. 26, 2017: Senate Hearings on Legislation to Protect Mueller
  • Sept. 26, 2017: Russian Facebook Ads Supported Trump
  • Sept. 27, 2017: Trump Tweets About Facebook
  • Sept. 28, 2017: Twitter Says It Has Cracked Down on Russian Accounts

Additions to our timeline of the Comey firing:

  • Sept. 26, 2017: Mueller Interviews of White House Staffers to Begin
  • Sept. 26, 2017: Senate Hearings on Legislation to Protect Mueller

 

My First Book is Now Available in Paperback

Crossing Hoffa: A Teamster’s Story
My first book — a Chicago Tribune “Best Book of the Year” — is now available in paperback

You can read it on Kindle, too.

Click here to read some of the reviews

 

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH SEPT. 25, 2017

Here are the latest updates the Trump-Russia, Kushner, and Comey Firing Timelines to include these entries at BillMoyers.com:

Additions to our main Trump-Russia Timeline:

  • July 7, 2016: Manafort Offers to Brief Oligarch Close to Putin [revision of previous entry]
  • Nov. 8, 2016: Election Day Troubles [revision of previous entry]
  • December 2016: Kushner Establishes Private Email Account for Government Business
  • Sept. 18, 2017: Reports: Mueller Threatened ‘to Indict’ Manafort; Manafort Was Under Surveillance Before, During and After Campaign [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 21, 2017: Facebook Agrees to Give Congress 3,000 Russian Ads
  • Sept. 22, 2017: Trump Tweets
  • Sept. 22, 2017: DHS Finally Notifies States That Russian Hackers Targeted Their Election Systems
  • Sept. 24, 2017: White House Stonewalling; Nunes on Offense

Additions to our Kushner Timeline:

  • December 2016: Kushner Establishes Private Email Account for Government Business

Additions to our timeline of the Comey firing:

  • Sept. 24, 2017: White House Stonewalling; Nunes on Offense

 

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH SEPT. 21, 2017

It’s already been a busy week for the Trump-Russia Timeline and a bad week for Paul Manafort. Here are the Updates so far:

Additions to our main Trump-Russia Timeline:

  • July 7, 2016: Manafort Offers to Brief Oligarch Close to Putin
  • Aug. 20, 2016: Russian Trolls Organize Trump Events in Florida
  • June or July 2017: Mueller Interviews Rosenstein
  • Sept. 19, 2017: Manafort’s Lawyer Responds
  • Sept. 19, 2017: Michael Cohen Issues Statement; Senate Intelligence Committee Not Pleased
  • Sept. 19, 2017: RNC Paying Legal Fees for Donald Trump and Don Jr.
  • Sept. 20, 2017: Mueller Seeking White House Documents on Flynn, Comey Firings

Additions to our timeline of the Comey firing:

  • June or July 2017: Mueller Interviews Rosenstein
  • Sept. 20, 2017: Mueller Seeking White House Documents on Flynn, Comey Firings

THE CHARLOTTE SCHOOL OF LAW AND A WHISTLEBLOWER

The latest developments at the Charlotte School of Law are the culmination of regulatory capture. The last significant ABA task force addressing the crisis in legal education kicked the can down the road, as did all of its predecessors. That came as no surprise because the head of the task force was Dennis W. Archer. He also chaired the national policy board of InfiLaw, a consortium of Charlotte and two other marginal for-profit law schools owned by venture capitalists.

The Persistent Problem

Without the ability to exploit vulnerable prospective law students willing to incur six-figure law school debt in return for limited prospects of meaningful JD-required jobs, the InfiLaw schools—Charlotte, Arizona Summit, and Florida Coastal School of Law—probably would have gone out of business long ago. It’s a safe bet that InfiLaw’s owners would not send their kids to any of them.

Only recently did the ABA take steps to revoke Charlotte’s accreditation. The school lost access to student loan money, and now its doors are closed. In March 2017, the ABA put Arizona Summit on probation for reasons that included a 25 percent bar exam passage rate for its July 2016 graduates taking the test for the first time. Florida Coastal’s 2016 graduates are faring so poorly in the job market that its end may be in sight: only 36 percent of graduates obtained full-time long-term JD-required jobs. Meanwhile, Florida Coastal grads have the distinction of obtaining degrees from a school that is among the leaders in law school debt: almost $160,000. Arizona Summit’s grads are right up there with them.

For years, InfiLaw has been a poster child for a persistent problem, but it’s not the only offender. Ten years after the Great Recession decimated the demand for new law school graduates, the ABA has ignored a perverse incentive system arising from a dysfunctional market. Specifically, marginal law schools lack accountability for their graduates’ poor job prospects. Those schools live on student loans—which is to say that they would die without them. But once students make their tuition payments, their schools have no skin in the game.

Even Archer’s task force report acknowledged that 25 percent of law schools derive at least 88 percent of their revenues from tuition. The overriding goal becomes maximizing revenues by filling classroom seats with tuition-paying bodies. At most marginal schools, that has meant lowering admission standards–an action that later reflects itself in declining bar passage rates for graduates. The result: unemployed law school graduates are burdened with enormous non-dischargeable debt for degrees of dubious value.

What Will It Take?

Perhaps a Charlotte whistleblower will bring change to a profession that has shown a consistent unwillingness to police itself. The allegations from former Charlotte School of Law Professor Barbara Bernier, who filed suit in June 2016 under the False Claims Act, prompted a federal investigation. She alleges that the school defrauded taxpayers of more than $285 million over a five-year period. According to the suit, Charlotte used dubious tactics to shore up the school’s performance numbers, protect its accreditation, and keep federal student loan dollars flowing.

Bernier claims that admissions officers had quotas of students they had to accept to keep their jobs. She alleges that over a six-year period beginning in 2010, 1,355 substandard students were enrolled, resulting in improper government payments to the school totaling $285 million. She asserts that the school discouraged some students from taking the bar exam because it thought they were likely to fail. Even so, the school’s pass rate has dropped steadily and its February 2017 results were the worst in the state: 25 percent. For those repeating the exam, the February 2017 news was worse: 18 percent passed.

How could this happen? A better question is, why wouldn’t it? Bernier’s allegations are consistent with revenue-maximizing behavior that the current law school business model incentivizes without regard to graduates’ outcomes.

“At Charlotte, there was constant talk of investors — referring to the school’s owners,” the Charlotte School of Law whistleblower professor told The New York Times, “and the focus was on the number of students. They were bringing them in and setting them up and then failing them out.”

InfiLaw has until Oct. 20 to file a formal answer to the complaint. Perhaps someday its owners and those who run other marginal law schools across the country will answer to their students who leave such institutions with big debt and limited JD-required job prospects. Every year, the ranks of those alumni grow.

USING THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: IDENTIFYING TRUMP’S TELLS

[This article first appeared at Billmoyers.com on Sept. 19, 2017]

Trump dominates the news constantly. But consider the timing of his most stunning words, deeds and tweets in the context of the Trump-Russia Timeline and this question emerges: What happened in the Russia investigation to set him off this time? Sometimes, the public doesn’t learn the answer for months. But eventually, a pattern becomes clear. Some of his worst outbursts are connected to his biggest problem: Russia.

For example, on Jan. 27, Trump issued his first immigration travel ban. Defense Secretary James Mattis saw the executive order only a few hours before Trump arrived at the Pentagon for the signing ceremony. As Trump signed it, Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly was on the phone receiving his first full briefing on the new policy. Because Customs and Border Protection officials had no advance warning that the ban was coming, the result was worldwide chaos. Airports became scenes of mass demonstrations.

Everyone listening to Trump’s campaign rhetoric knew that some kind of immigration ban was coming. But why rush it out only a week after the inauguration? Observers blamed the debacle on incompetence and inexperience. But perhaps other events — unknown to the public at the time — played a part.

A day before Trump issued the ban, Acting Attorney General Sally Yates was telling White House counsel Don McGahn that then-national security adviser Michael Flynn was vulnerable to Russian blackmail. She said that White House statements about Flynn’s contacts with the Russian ambassador in late December 2016 — as President Obama was imposing new sanctions for Putin’s interference with the US election — didn’t line up with what the Justice Department knew to be true. The next day, Trump invited then-FBI Director James Comey to dinner, where he asked for Comey’s personal loyalty and received a cool response.

A single coincidence of three stunning events — Yates’ revelations to McGahn, the Comey loyalty dinner, and the botched rollout of an illegal travel ban — would not alone prove that Trump’s most jaw-dropping comments, accusations and policy pronouncements are reactions to or deflections from bad news about the Russia investigation. But consider the context surrounding some of Trump’s other dramatic presidential moments.

***

***

***

  • Bad news: Beginning on July 8 and continuing throughout the month, reports about the June 9, 2016 meeting among Trump’s top campaign advisers and the Russians dribbled out. On July 18, 2017, The Washington Post and CNN identified the last of the three Russian attendees — an employee of the Russian real estate company owned by Aras Agalarov and his son, Emin. Trump had prior — and quite profitable for Trump — business dealings with the Agalarovs.
  • Trump outburst: In an expansive interview with The New York Times on July 19 and contemporaneous tweets, Trump launched attacks on Attorney General Jeff Sessions, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and former FBI Director Comey.

***

  • Bad news: On July 25, in advance of his congressional testimony, American financier William Browder released a statement explaining the interconnections between US sanctions, Putin and Russian adoptions — the supposed topic of the June 9, 2016 meeting between top Trump campaign advisers and the Russians. On the morning of July 26, the FBI conducted a surprise raid on the home of Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort.
  • Trump outburst: A few hours after the Manafort raid and without consulting the secretary of defense or the joint chiefs of staff, Trump tweeted a new ban on military service by transgender individuals. Senior military officials immediately distanced themselves from Trump’s tweet.

***

***

  • Bad news: Around Aug. 11 – Mueller told the White House that he wanted to interview numerous Trump staffers.
  • Trump outburst: Aug. 11-12 – Trump refuses to denounce white supremacy in his condemnation of the Charlottesville attacks, instead noting “violence on many sides” of what was clearly an incident of domestic, white supremacist terrorism. He then takes off on a campaign tour during which he continues to draw attention to his earlier comments, stir up controversy, divide Americans, and dominate the news.

***

  • Bad news: Sept. 17-18 — The New York Times reported that one of its journalists overheard two of Trump’s personal lawyers — John Dowd and Ty Cobb — at a Washington, DC restaurant publicly discussing internal strategy disagreements over Trump’s defense. The dispute involved Cobb’s and White House counsel Don McGahn’s differing opinions on how to deal with special counsel Mueller’s discovery requests. Reportedly, Cobb wanted to disclose everything; McGahn wanted to hold some materials back. “He’s got a couple documents locked in a safe,” Cobb told Dowd. Then on Sept. 18, The Times reported that when the FBI raided Manafort’s home, special counsel Mueller reportedly informed him that he would be indicted. Later that day, CNN reported that the FBI had obtained a FISA warrant to tape Manafort’s telephone conversations prior to and after the election.
  • Trump outburst: Sept. 17 — Trump retweets several bizarre images, including a video of him hitting a golf ball that strikes Hillary Clinton in the back and causes her to stumble as she boards a plane.

In context, Trump’s dangerous and often divisive outbursts suggest that the country is at the mercy of a president who uses the power of his office to exploit a manipulable press, vulnerable citizens and tragic events in the service of eclipsing the issue that continues to dog his presidency: the Russia investigation. They’re also what poker players call “tells” — inadvertent revelations. When he acts out in ways that are extreme — even for Trump — he could be revealing that something he doesn’t like is unfolding in the story that he wants everyone to ignore: Russia. At those moments, everyone should pay especially close attention to it.

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH SEPT. 18, 2017

Here are the latest additions to the Trump-Russia Timeline at Billmoyers.com. I’ve also added new names to the Timeline’s filtering function: Steve Bannon, Robert Mercer, Julian Assange, Rep. Dana Rohrbacher, Rep. Devin Nunes, and Cambridge Analytica.

Additions to our main Trump-Russia Timeline:

  • Nov. 8-11, 2013: The Miss Universe Pageant in Moscow [revision of previous entry]
  • June 2015 to May 2017: Kremlin-linked Russian Company Buys Ads on Facebook [revision of previous entry]
  • June 2016: Kushner Takes Control of Trump Digital Effort and Hires Cambridge Analytica [revision of previous entry]
  • May 12, 2017: DOJ Settles Civil Russian Money Laundering Case; Criminal Case Continues [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 6, 2017: Facebook Reverses Earlier Denials; Admits Russian Trolls Bought Ads During Election
  • During the week of Sept. 11, 2017: McGahn Has “A Couple Documents Locked in a Safe”
  • Sept. 13, 2017: GOP Congressman Seeks Pardon for Assange
  • Sept. 18, 2017: NYT Reports Manafort “to be indicted”; FBI Taped Him

Additions to our Kushner Timeline:

  • June 2015 to May 2017: Kremlin-linked Russian Company Buys Ads on Facebook [revision of previous entry]
  • June 2016: Kushner Takes Control of Trump Digital Effort and Hires Cambridge Analytica [revision of previous entry]
  • May 12, 2017: DOJ Settles Civil Russian Money Laundering Case; Criminal Case Continues [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 6, 2017: Facebook Reverses Earlier Denials; Admits Russian Trolls Bought Ads During Election
  • Sept. 13, 2017: GOP Congressman Seeks Pardon for Assange

MIDWEEK UPDATES TO THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE

The plot thickens: Newest Additions to the Trump-Russia Timeline at Billmoyers.com. Here are the titles of the new or newly revised entries:

  • June 2015: Flynn Promotes Joint US-Russia Nuclear Project in Mideast
  • Late December 2016: Bannon, Flynn and Kushner Meet Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi [revision of previous entry]
  • During the Week of June 19, 2017: Trump Lawyers Reportedly Learn About Emails Relating to June 9, 2016, Meeting [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 2, 2017: DOJ: No Evidence of Wiretapping [revision of previous entry]
  • Sept. 12, 2017: Trump’s Press Secretary Says FBI Should Investigate Comey
  • Sept. 12, 2017: House Democrats Refer Potential Flynn Misconduct to Mueller
  • Sept. 13, 2017: Sarah Sanders Doubles-Down on Comey
  • Sept. 13, 2017: Mueller Investigating Flynn’s Son
  • Sept. 13, 2017: Rice’s Reasons for ‘Unmasking’ Trump’s Associates Satisfies GOP

 

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH SEPT. 11, 2017

Here’s a link to the newest additions to the Trump-Russia Timeline at Billmoyers.com. The summary titles may pique your interest:

  • Oct. 3, 2013: Trump Praises Putin, Again
  • Feb. 10, 2014: Trump Says Putin Contacted Him in November 2013
  • April 12, 2014: Trump Praises Putin, Again
  • May 27, 2014: Trump Boasts about Relationship with Putin
  • June 20, 2014: Trump Embraces Putin’s Criticism of “American Exceptionalism”
  • March 18, 2015: Trump Launches Exploratory Committee for Presidential Bid
  • June 18, 2015: Trump Boasts about Russian Relationships
  • June 29, 2015: Trump Says He Can Get Along with Russians
  • June 2015 to May 2017: Kremlin-linked Russian Company Buys Ads on Facebook
  • Sept. 27, 2015: Trump Praises Putin, Again
  • Oct. 6, 2015: Trumps Says He’s Met Putin
  • Oct. 13, 2015: Sater Sends Michael Cohen Letter of Intent for Trump Tower Moscow
  • Oct. 17, 2015: “Putin Loves Donald Trump”
  • Nov. 10, 2016: Trump: ‘I Got to Know [Putin] Very Well’ [revision of previous entry]
  • April 26, 2016: Trump Embraces Putin, Again
  • June 3, 2016: Trump Repeats Putin’s PraisJune 6 and 7, 2016: Don Jr.’s Phone Calls with Emin Agalarov
  • June 9, 2016: Don Jr., Manafort, Kushner Meet With Russian Lawyer [revision of previous entry]
  • July 27, 2016: Trump Embraces Putin, Again
  • Sept. 7, 2016: Trump Embraces Putin, Again
  • Dec. 23, 2016: Trump Quotes Putin
  • March 2017: Don Jr. Denies Any Campaign Contacts with Russians
  • Sometime around Aug. 11, 2017: Mueller Wants to Interview White House Staffers
  • Sept. 5, 2017: Congressman Issues More Subpoenas Relating to Steele Dossier
  • Sept. 7, 2017: Don Jr. Talks to Senate Intelligence Committee

THE TRUMP-RUSSIA SCANDAL ROLLS ON

All eyes have been on Harvey-DACA-Korea-Irma. But the Trump-Russia TImeline on BillMoyers.com has stunning new entries.

And we now have new Interactive versions of

The Pence Timeline,

The Kushner Timeline, and

The Comey Firing Timeline.

TRUMP-RUSSIA TIMELINE: UPDATES THROUGH AUG. 31, 2017

Here are the latest additions to the Trump-Russia Timeline at BillMoyers.com. More updates are in process and you can see a summary of the latest entires in a separate post appearing next to the introduction to the Trump-Russia Timeline.

Oct. 28, 2015: Trump Signs Letter of Intent for Trump Tower in Moscow 

Trump signs a letter of intent for the use of his name on a planned Trump Tower in Moscow. If completed it would be one of the largest residential projects in real estate history and, according to Felix Sater, the ”the world’s tallest building in Moscow.” A Moscow-based developer, I.C. Expert Investment Co., would have paid Trump a licensing fee. After news of the deal breaks in August 2017, Trump Organization Executive Vice President and attorney Michael Cohen tells The Wall Street Journal that he had discussed the proposal with Trump once before Trump signed it and a second time when he did. [Added Aug. 30, 2017]

***

November 2015 – January 2016: Pursuit of Trump Tower in Moscow

A February 2017 article in The New York Times, citing Felix Sater, reports that Trump’s bid for the presidency brings work on a Trump Tower in Moscow to a halt in the Fall of 2015. Emin Agalarov makes a similar statement in a March 2017 interview with Forbes; Agalarov says he and his father had previously signed a letter of intent with their Trump counterparts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. “He ran for president, so we dropped the idea,” Agalarov says. “But if he hadn’t run we would probably be in the construction phase today.”

Later reporting indicates the story might not be so simple.

In July 2017, Yahoo! News’ Michael Isikoff reports that work with the Agalarovs to build a Trump Tower in Moscow came to a halt because of an economic downturn in Russia that was caused, in part, by sanctions the US and others imposed on Russia in 2014, following its intervention in Ukraine.

In an Aug. 1, 2017 article, Talking Points Memo’s Sam Thielman reports that Sater was still working on a deal for Trump Tower in Moscow in “November-December” 2015. In interviews with Thielman, Sater claims that it didn’t involve the Agalarovs, but he doesn’t elaborate.

On Aug. 27, 2017, The Washington Post reports that, in November 2015, Sater urges Trump to come to Moscow to tout the proposal and suggests that he “could get President Vladimir Putin to say ‘great things’ about Trump.” According to The Post, “Sater also predicted in an email that he and Trump Organization leaders would soon be celebrating — both one of the biggest residential projects in real estate history and Donald Trump’s election as president, according to two of the people with knowledge of the exchange.” The Post also reports that, “Sater wrote to Trump Organization Executive Vice President Michael Cohen ‘something to the effect of, “Can you believe two guys from Brooklyn are going to elect a president?”’”

On Aug. 28, 2017, The New York Times picks up the story, quoting from one of Sater’s Nov. 3, 2015 emails to Cohen: “I will get Putin on this program and we will get Donald elected… Buddy our boy can become president of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of Putin’s team to buy in on this, I will manage this process.”

Following Sater’s recommendation, in January 2016, Cohen seeks the help of Dmitry Peskov, Putin’s personal spokesperson and the Kremlin’s top press aide. According to subsequent reporting in The Washington Post, Cohen writes, “Over the past few months I have been working with a company based in Russia regarding the development of a Trump Tower – Moscow project in Moscow City. Without getting into lengthy specifics the communication between our two sides has stalled. As this project is too important, I am hereby requesting your assistance. I respectfully request someone, preferably you, contact me so that I might discuss the specifics as well as arranging meetings with the appropriate individuals. I thank you in advance for your assistance and look forward to hearing from you soon.”

Peskov receives Cohen’s email, and later says, “But as far as we don’t respond to business topics, this is not our job, we did not send a response.”

According to The Post, “Trump never went to Moscow as Sater proposed. And although investors and Trump’s company signed a letter of intent, they lacked the land and permits to proceed and the project was abandoned at the end of January 2016, just before the presidential primaries began, several people familiar with the proposal said.”

On Aug. 28, 2017, the Trump Organization issues a statement saying, “To be clear, the Trump Organization has never had any real estate holdings or interests in Russia.”

Cohen likewise issues a statement, saying, “I did not ask or brief Mr. Trump, or any of his family, before I made the decision to terminate further work on the proposal. The Trump Tower Moscow proposal was not related in any way to Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign.” In an Aug. 28, 2017 interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cohen says he discussed the proposal with Trump only three times: once before Trump signed the Oct. 28, 2015 letter of intent, a second time when Trump signed it, and a third time when work on the deal ended. [Revised Sept. 1, 2017]

***

April 3, 2016: Panama Papers Leaked 

A massive leak of more than 11 million papers from the world’s fourth largest offshore law firm reveals a money trail allegedly showing a network of secret offshore deals and vast loans worth $2 billion leading to Russia’s president Vladimir Putin and his associates. Dmitry Peskov, the Kremlin’s top spokesperson, dismisses the accusations as “another series of fibs.” Beyond Russia, the Panama Papers implicate politicians and public leaders throughout the world and, over the subsequent year, lead to audits, investigations, inquiries, and arrests in at least 79 countries. In February 2017, Panama police arrest the founders of the law firm at the center of the scandal and charge them with money laundering. They deny wrongdoing. [Added Aug. 30, 2017]

April 8, 2016: Putin Convenes Russian Federation Security Council

Since Jan. 15, 2016, Putin has been meeting weekly with the Russian Federation Security Council weekly. As the leak of the Panama Papers approached, the council met more frequently — on March 28, 31 and April 5. The Kremlin’s official summary of the April 8 meeting states, “Participants discussed the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict and the efforts Russia is undertaking these days to facilitate it. Current domestic and international issues were also discussed with a special focus on the creation of the National Guard.”

Russian investigative journalists Andrei Soldatov and Irina Borogan — experts on how the Kremlin operates in the digital sphere — believe there was actually more going on. In August 2017, they told The Washington Post that “the meeting of the Russian Security Council on April 8, when Putin urgently gathered only the most trusted officials — most of them with secret services background — could be the meeting when a very sensitive matter was discussed, such as the need for a retaliatory response to the Panama Papers exposés.”

Soldatov and Borogan wrote in a 2017 book that Russian interference in the US election may have been a response to the Panama Papers. “Putin believed the Panama Papers attack was sponsored by Hillary Clinton’s people — this, in a way, provided him with a ‘justification’ for a retaliatory operation,” they told The Post. [Added Aug. 30, 2017]

***

Aug. 7, 2017: Trump Complains About Bill to Limit His Power to Fire Mueller

Four days after Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) had co-sponsored legislation that would limit Trump’s ability to fire special counsel Mueller, Trump reportedly calls Tillis to complain about the bill and say that he doesn’t want it to pass. According to Politico, in late July, Trump had also called Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) to complain about the then-pending Russian sanctions bill. Corker reportedly told Trump that the legislation would pass both houses of Congress with bipartisan support. “It seems he is just always focused on Russia,” one senior GOP aide tells Politco. [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

***

Aug. 9, 2017: Trump Blasts McConnell Over Russia Investigation

During a phone call that became a profane shouting match, Trump reportedly accuses Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) of bungling the health care issue. But according to subsequent reporting by The New York Times citing Republicans briefed on the conversation, Trump is even more upset that McConnell has, in his view, not protected him from investigations of Russia’s election interference. [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

***

Aug. 11, 2017: Russian Lobbyist Testifies Before Mueller’s Grand Jury 

Rinat Akhmetshin, a Russian lobbyist who, along with Russians Natalie Veselnitskaya and Ike Kaveladze, attended the June 9, 2016 meeting at Trump Tower with Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort, testifies for several hours before special counsel Mueller’s grand jury. [Added Sept. 1, 2017]

Aug. 11, 2017: House Democrats Renew Request to Subpoena Deutsche Bank Documents Relating to Trump

Democrats on the House Committee on Financial Services ask Chairman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) to issue a subpoena to Deutsche Bank. They request that the subpoena seek documents relating to Russian money-laundering and to Deutsche Bank accounts involving Trump and his family. The Democratic committee members note that Rep. Hensarling never answered their March 10, 2017 letter seeking a “thorough, objective, and bipartisan investigation…into the Russian money laundering scheme at Deutsche Bank….” [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

***

Aug. 22, 2017: Fusion GPS Co-Founder Testifies About “Steele Dossier”

Glenn Simpson, a former reporter for The Wall Street Journal and co-founder of the consulting firm Fusion GPS, testifies to Senate Judiciary Committee investigators for more than 10 hours.

Working for a client that it has not yet named, Fusion GPS had hired former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele to compile what became the infamous “Steele dossier” about Trump’s alleged ties to Russia. Trump has decried the dossier as fake news, and US intelligence officials have testified that it was not the basis for any US intelligence findings of Russian interference with the 2016 election.

It remains unclear which, if any, of the allegations in the dossier US officials have been able to confirm independently. In a statement following Simpson’s session with the committee, Simpson’s lawyer says, “Fusion GPS is proud of the work it has conducted and stands by it.” [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

***

Aug. 25, 2017: Mueller Subpoenas Grand Jury Witnesses in Manafort Probe

NBC News reports that special counsel Robert Mueller has subpoenaed public relations executives who worked with Paul Manafort’s international lobbying effort on behalf Ukraine from 2012 to 2014. According to Manafort’s subsequently amended reports, a pro-Russian political party that ran the country had paid Manafort $17 million for his consulting work during that period. [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

***

Aug. 25, 2017: Mueller Investigating Possible Flynn Connection to Clinton Email Project

The Wall Street Journal reports that Mueller is examining the role, if any, that Trump’s former national security adviser Mike Flynn may have played in Peter W. Smith’s effort to obtain Hillary Clinton’s emails from Russian hackers during the campaign. Smith was a long-time political operative who had told the Journal in May 2017 that during September 2016 he had tried to assemble a team that would pursue those emails. Smith died ten days after the interview. [Added Aug. 28, 2017]

Aug. 29, 2017: CNN reports that special counsel Robert Mueller has subpoenaed Paul Manafort’s former lawyer and Manafort’s current spokesperson. [Added Aug. 30, 2017]

Aug. 30, 2017: Mueller Consulting with NY Attorney General on Manafort

Politico reports that, in recent weeks, teams working with special counsel Mueller and New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman have been sharing evidence in connection with their investigations of Paul Manafort and his financial transactions. [Added Sept. 1, 2017]

Aug. 30, 2017: More Reports on Manafort Ties to Russian Oligarch

The Wall Street Journal reports on Manafort’s alleged financial dealings with Oleg Derispaka, a Russian oligarch. According to The Journal, the dealings began in 2004 and the two men had a falling out, cutting ties in 2014, but Manafort’s work for Ukraine continued into 2015. According to a court filing on Deripaska’s behalf in May 2017, he “never had any arrangement, whether contractual or otherwise, with Mr. Manafort to advance the interests of the Russian government.” [Added Sept. 1, 2017]

Aug. 30, 2017: Cohen Rebuts “Steele Dossier”

The New York Times reports that Michael Cohen’s lawyer has provided the House Intelligence Committee with an eight-page, point-by-point rebuttal of the allegations in the ‘Steele dossier’ insofar as they pertain to Cohen. “We have not uncovered a single document that would in any way corroborate the dossier’s allegations regarding Mr. Cohen, nor do we believe that any such document exists,” wrote Cohen’s lawyer. “Mr. Cohen vehemently denies the claims made in the dossier about him, which are false and remain wholly unsubstantiated.” [Added Sept. 1, 2017]